Enhancing the Authentic Object: Mineral landscapes and the Enlightened Eye.Demonstration
Jason Cleverly, Falmouth University, UK
There is a growing interest amongst artists, curators and designers in devising new multimedia assemblies to enhance engagement with museum objects and collections. Objects can be designed, enriched or re-assessed through networked digital technologies, enabling interaction, participation and collaboration. Combining objects and digital connectivity presents design challenges and opportunities for innovative responses that allow users to create and curate their own experiences.
Despite this multivalent discourse over object meanings, museums themselves are concerned with signalling an authenticity in objects. The use of online databases and digital simulacra, allow the object to be extricated from the museum context to lead multiple existences. However far from depleting the auratic embodiment of the object, this distribution enhances authenticity, increasing virtuality creates a demand for a counterpoint in and from the material object. (Witcomb 1997)
The Enlightened Eye is a museum interactive built and designed by the author to enhance visitor experience of mineral specimens. Mineral samples can be closely examined by a digital microscope, a touch-screen interface, allows visitors to annotate and select, creating unique drawn responses that can be reviewed and shared online.The styling is an evocation of the camera obscura and the orrery. The digital/tangible assembly conforms to a programme of aesthetic affordance, to support memorable interactions, by inviting virtual and material responses, the Enlightened Eye enhances both the material authenticity of objects under scrutiny and expands visitor experience.
This paper considers comparative initiatives, evaluates the performance of the Enlightened Eye, reports on located visitor behavior, analysis and implications. Close evaluation reveals the situated design is well navigated, however visits to the online gallery of responsive drawings appear less so, revealing a continued interest in the authentic object.
ALLEN, S. 2004. 'Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain'. Science Education 88(S1), [online].
ARNONE, M., R. SMALL, S. CHAUNCEY and H. MCKENNA. 2011. 'Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: a new research agenda'. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 181.
BAIN, R. and E. ELLENBOGEN. 2002. 'Placing Objects within Disciplinary Perspectives: Examples from History and Science'. In Scott G. Paris (ed.). Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, .
BOLTER, Jay David and Richard GRUSIN. 2000. Remediation : Understanding New Media. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. and K. HERMANSON. 1999. 'Intrinsic Motivation in Museums: Why Does One Want to Learn?'. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (ed.). The Educational Role of the Museum
Leicester Readers in Museum Studies. (2nd edn). London: Routledge, .
DUDLEY, S. 2012. 'Museums and Things'. In Sandra H. Dudley and Susan M. Pearce (eds.). Thing about Museums : Objects and Experience, Representation and Contestation : Essays in Honour of Professor Susan M. Pearce. London: Routledge, xix, 396 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
FALK, J. and L. DIERKING. 2000. Learning from Museums : Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
GOODWIN, C. 2000. 'Action and embodiment within situated human action'. Journal of Pragmatics, 32.
HEATH, C., J. HINDMARSH and P. LUFF. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research : Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. Los Angeles ; London: SAGE.
HENNING, M. 2007. 'Legibility and Affect: Museums as New Media'. In Sharon Macdonald and Paul Basu (eds.). Exhibition Experiments. Oxford: Blackwell, .
MCDONALD, S. and P. BASU. 2007. 'Introduction: experiments in Exhibition, Ethnography, art, and Science'. In Sharon Macdonald and Paul Basu (eds.). Exhibition Experiments. Oxford: Blackwell, 1.
OVERHILL, Heidi. 2015. 'Design as Choreography: Information in Action'. Curator: The Museum Journal, 58(1), 5-15.
PEARCE, S. 1994. 'Museum Objects.'. In Susan M. Pearce (ed.). Interpreting Objects and Collections Leicester Readers in Museum Studies. London: Routledge, .
PUTNAM, James. 2001. Art and Artifact : The Museum as Medium. London: Thames & Hudson.
RENNINGER, K.,A., S. HIDI and A. KRAPP. 1992. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Psychology Press.
RIDE, P. 2012. 'Understanding the Effect of New Media Artwork in the Museum'. In Suzanne Macleod, Laura Hourston Hanks and Jonathan Hale (eds.). Museum Making. Taylor and Francis, 267
ROWE, S. 2002. 'The Role of Objects in Active, Distributed Meaning-Making'. In Scott G. Paris (ed.). Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums.
WEIBEL, P. and B. LATOUR. 2007. 'Experimenting with Representation: Iconolash and Making things Public'. In Sharon Macdonald and Paul Basu (eds.). Exhibition Experiments. Oxford: Blackwell, .
WITCOMB, A. 1997. 'The End of the Mausoleum: Museums in the Age of Electronic Communication'. Museums and the Web International conference [Online]. Available at: http://www.archimuse.com/mw97/speak/witcomb.htm. [Accessed 5/7/2015].